Welcome to Spinwatch
Nuclear Spin


          Content
Home Home
About SpinWatch About SpinWatch
 Articles By Category Articles By Category
Latest News Latest News
 News By Category News By Category
Blogs Blogs
Reviews Reviews

          Newsletter
Stay informed with the Spinwatch newsletter.


          Information
Book Shop Book Shop
Nuclear Spin Nuclear Spin
 Events Calendar
News Feeds News Feeds
Video Video
Links Links
Feedback Feedback
Donations Donations
Whistleblowers Whistleblowers


         Whistleblower
Are You Disillusioned with the PR tactics of your employer?

Or have you got a story on the PR industry?

Call the spinbusting hotline:
+44 (0)7939 529 349

or Email: whistleblower

         Saro Wiwa

         Technorati Authority
View blog authority

Congress: Science for Sale? PDF Print E-mail

The Food and Drug Administration has long permitted its use, but in recent years concerns about the chemical have grown as studies have indicated low doses of the substance can disrupt hormone systems in laboratory animals and possibly increase the risk of cancer or other serious illness.

The American Chemistry Council has defended the chemical, saying scientists' concerns over Bisphenol A were "distinctly at odds" with findings from other studies by both government organizations and scientific bodies. "All of these evaluations support the conclusion that bisphenol-A is not a risk to human health at the extremely low levels to which consumers might be exposed," the group said. On its Web site, Nalgene's manufacturer, Nalge Nunc International, refers to research on Bisphenol A by the FDA, the Environmental Protection Agency, the American Plastics Council and "other reliable sources from around the world" to state "we firmly believe in the safety of our products."

The Weinberg Group may play a role in arranging just the kinds of expert panels and scientific research the chemical industry points to in defense of its products, Dingell suggested.

The chairman pointed to a confidential Weinberg Group document published in 2006, in which the firm suggested to DuPont de Nemours & Company several ways it could help "shape the debate" about one of its chemical products. The firm proposed developing "blue-ribbon panels," "constructing a study to establish" that DuPont's chemical was safe, and arranging the publication of papers "dispelling the alleged nexus" between the company's chemical and its alleged harmful effects on humans.

"We will harness...the scientific and intellectual capital of our company with one goal in mind -- creating the outcome our client desires," the 2003 letter stated. The company reportedly confirmed the authenticity of the letter to the publication which revealed it, Environmental Science & Technology.

A call to the Weinberg firm was directed to the office of its CEO, Matthew Weinberg. His assistant said he was out of the office at the moment and unavailable for comment.

 

 
< Prev   Next >
Upcoming Events

          Latest News
More News

          Latest Reviews
          Latest Blogs
 

Designed and Maintained By SCS Web Design
Website Enquiries Contact webmaster@spinwatch.org