|
blairwatch.co.uk 4 June 2006
Been holding off on this one, but it's looking increasingly likely
that the East London 'terrorist raid' on Friday was based on faulty
intelligence and badly handled. The evidence for this is roundabout,
true, but based on past history, when the Met starts leaking bullshit
to friendly newspapers.
A CHEMICAL bomb held by
Islamic terrorists is primed to go off at any time, police feared last
night. The device is believed to have been designed to release a toxic
cloud in a crowded space — killing hundreds
The Sun
...right thinking men and women start drawing conclusions.
The lack of corroborating evidence is the key here - the BBC
admitted that they'd been told the same thing ('number of dead in three
figures'), but not what the alleged chemical was (even though the
police knew) and that the informant was 'possibly unreliable'. Single
source, unreliable human intelligence on chemical weapons? Porton Down
involved? Do we detect a whiff of 45 minutes and ricin here, mixed with
the aroma of a bull's back end?
Which brings us to the shooting - according to the Sun (or the Met, even):
British-born Royal Mail worker Kahar Kalam, 23, was hit by a bullet in the chest after cops warned him not to move.
source
While the BBC has:
One line of inquiry is that there was a struggle with
police and a gun went off accidentally, said BBC home affairs
correspondent Danny Shaw. and
the only official statement about the shooting - from
the head of the anti-terrorist branch Peter Clarke - did not say police
shot the man. And according to his lawyer:
He was woken up about four in the morning by screams
from downstairs, got out of bed in his pyjamas obviously unarmed,
nothing in his hands and hurrying down the stairs.
Her client, whom she said was innocent, was shot "without any warning" as he came down the stairs. He
wasn't asked to freeze, given any warning and didn't know the people in
his house were police officers until after he was shot,"
Today's Screws, as we've seen, claims the brother did it. So an unarmed man was shot by another unarmed man after they
struggled with people they didn't know were policeman, but who *were*
armed. All very confusing. If the guys in the house *were* armed do you
really think the police wouldn't have given them the De Menezes
treatment?
One final joyous word from Murdoch's finest:
The alleged bomb plot is the fourth major conspiracy
hatched by al-Qaeda sympathisers to have been smashed by security
services in Britain since the July 7 bombings which killed 52.
A source said: “After 9/11 in 2001, we were dealing with one major
scenario every six months. Now we deal with serious terrorist
conspiracies every six days
World-class bullshit there. You wear a beard, go to a mosque, the
police bash your door in and shoot your brother and you're now an
'al-Qaeda sympathiser'. I didn't realise it was so easy to join. |
Events Calendar
