Julie-ann Davies, 17 July 2006
When is a journalist not a journalist? When she doesn’t let the facts prevent her from furthering a corporate-funded agenda.
We recently became aware of a December 2005 entry on Lene Johansen's blog claiming SpinWatch is “run” and funded by the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD). Johansen, an arts and journalism graduate, is the Director of US Operations for Swedish think tank Eudoxa and writes editorial content for Tech Central Station — a website whose funders, past and present, include AT&T, NASDAQ, McDonald’s, Microsoft and Exxon Mobil.
Johansen cited the ActivistCash.com
website as the source of her information on CMD. ActivistCash is the
creation of Rick Berman a Washington-based lobbyist for the restaurant,
alcohol and tobacco industries. The information on the site is laced
with inaccuracies and has been heavily criticised for its unreliability.
ActivistCash is a project of the Center for Consumer Freedom
which according to its website is: “…a nonprofit coalition of
restaurants, food companies, and consumers working together to promote
personal responsibility and protect consumer choices. The growing cabal
of "food cops," health care enforcers, militant activists, meddling
bureaucrats, and violent radicals who think they know "what's best for
you" are pushing against our basic freedoms. We're here to push back.”
One of the most basic rules of honest and effective journalism is
“check your facts”. SpinWatch is an independent organisation based in
Europe. We are not “run” by CMD and receive absolutely no funding from
them. We would have told Johansen this if she had asked — but no effort
was made to contact us.
In her CV
Johansen describes Eudoxa as a: “Built for profit think tank with
$35,000 in revenue [for the year] 2004.” In addition to working for
Eudoxa for the past six years Johansen “writes editorials on health
care and biotechnology for Tech Central Station”
Between December 2004 and November 2005 she also worked as a Communications Specialist for the Show-Me Institute
in St Louis where she: “Planned public relations strategy and
information systems strategy for start up state policy think tank.”
A Eudoxa press release
states: “The main focus of Eudoxa is explaining the cultural impact of
emerging technologies integrating our policy analysis with classical
free-market ideas and dynamist thoughts of experimentation, innovation
and decentralization.”
Eudoxa’s Website
says: “Our mission is not to influence the current agenda, as that has
already been set by intellectuals more than a decade ago. Our work is
to influence tomorrow's agenda.
“We have identified several emerging technologies that will have a
profound influence on our society, the way we perceive humanity and the
way we live our lives in a few years time. Our mission is to look at
these technologies from our free-market, dynamist perspective and put
them into a political, cultural and historical context.”
Eudoxa actively promotes a policy of tobacco harm reduction
and argues: “The central idea of harm reduction is the recognition that
some people always have and always will engage in behaviours which
carry risks, like the use of tobacco.
“Harm reduction is intended to mitigate the potential harms
associated with tobacco use without prohibiting the use of related
products”. As a “for profit” think tank Eudoxa were probably delighted
to receive “…an unrestricted gift
from International Smokeless Tobacco Company Inc., an affiliate of the
US Smokeless Tobacco Company” to finance a harm reduction project.
Eudoxa is active in several other areas including, eliminating
tariffs on pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, nanotechnology, climate,
environment, intellectual property and health care policy. They are
closely linked to the International Policy Network and Stockholm Network.
Both of these networks promote a pro-corporate, free-market ideology and work to influence public opinion via conferences, seminars, books and the print and broadcast media. Lene
Johansen did not contact SpinWatch before making flawed allegations
about us. However, we did email her and offered to include her comments
in this article. So far she has not responded — the offer still stands.
|