Welcome to Spinwatch
Nuclear Spin


          Content
Home Home
About SpinWatch About SpinWatch
 Articles By Category Articles By Category
Latest News Latest News
 News By Category News By Category
Blogs Blogs
Reviews Reviews

          Newsletter
Stay informed with the Spinwatch newsletter.


          Information
Book Shop Book Shop
Nuclear Spin Nuclear Spin
 Events Calendar
News Feeds News Feeds
Video Video
Links Links
Feedback Feedback
Donations Donations
Whistleblowers Whistleblowers


         Whistleblower
Are You Disillusioned with the PR tactics of your employer?

Or have you got a story on the PR industry?

Call the spinbusting hotline:
+44 (0)7939 529 349

or Email: whistleblower

         Saro Wiwa

         Technorati Authority
View blog authority

Ceasefire breakdown seen as propaganda opportunity PDF Print E-mail
Owen Bowcott
The Guardian
December 29, 2005

The breakdown of the IRA's extended ceasefire in 1975 was anticipated in Whitehall as an opportunity to launch "black propaganda" attacks and blame republicans for the return to violence.

A memorandum drafted by the Foreign Office also proposed continuing clandestine contacts with the provisional movement and loyalist paramilitaries, while only arresting the leaders of hardline factions. The strategy reveals that behind the scenes there was little confidence that the IRA's suspension of hostilities would deliver a resolution to the conflict.

Attempts to engage Harold Wilson in negotiations had begun several years earlier. When opposition leader, he had met IRA leaders in Dublin and Buckinghamshire during 1972 and 1973. John O'Connell, an Irish MP who acted as the go-between, tried to arrange more contacts in early 1975. The prime minister referred the new approach to the Northern Ireland Office. "What he proposes is, in my view ... unacceptable," Wilson noted.

The suggested conditions for a "permanent truce" were the "appointment of a commission of three [to look at the future of the province] ... steady release of detainees, political amnesty when peace is permanent ... and the sending of two people to talk to the IRA".

By late January, the NIO was more optimistic. "There was an extremely strong desire for peace in both communities, as evinced by the large numbers who were attending peace rallies," an official noted.

On February 10, the IRA announced the suspension of hostilities. But early hopes were soon disappointed. Arthur Galsworthy, UK ambassador in Dublin, recorded that "contacts with Provisional Sinn Féin had continued spasmodically, but had revealed no sign of any desire on their part to discuss 'macro-political' questions".

A report from army headquarters in Lisburn in July, marked "secret", said: "We have seen many reports during the last six months indicating that PIRA [Provisional IRA] have been taking advantage of the ceasefire to carry out some degree of restructuring."

In August, shortly before the ceasefire expired, the Foreign Office drafted its strategy paper. Entitled The ending of the ceasefire: HM government's aims and the means to achieve them, the document noted its first duty was to "minimise the danger to the civilian population and to the security forces". The second was to "ensure that all the blame for the breakdown and consequent events lies on the PIRA in the eyes of the Catholic population, the Irish people and government, the USA, the Vatican, international public opinion generally and the British public".

Other aims were the "maintenance of contacts with Provisional Sinn Féin" and "Protestant paramilitaries" as well as the pursuit of "black propaganda designed to sow suspicions between the PIRA [and other republican factions]".

 
< Prev   Next >
Upcoming Events

          Latest News
More News

          Latest Reviews
          Latest Blogs
 

Designed and Maintained By SCS Web Design
Website Enquiries Contact webmaster@spinwatch.org