Sam Gardiner, 13 May 2008 

Con Coughlin writes a Friday column each week for the UK's Telegraph.  On Friday he wrote about Afghanistan : "Another week, another British fatality - and yet more evidence of Iran's lethal meddling on the battlefields of the war on terror."

He goes on to say the hand of Iran in the death of the  British soldier may never be proven, but in an attempt to justify his  assertion, he goes on to suggest it is because "the Revolutionary  Guards have become highly adept at covering their tracks."

His "evidence" that the Iranians are behind explosive devices in  Afghanistan goes beyond anything being suggested by even the most  anti-Iranian officials in either the US or British Government. One would think he would be at least a little self conscious about talking about evidence.

Sam Gardiner*, 6 May 2008

Yesterday's New York Times contains an article by Michael Gordon in which he reveals information from "an American official" that Hezbollah has been training Iraqi militia fighters in a camp near Tehran.  UGH!  This is so deja vu that it made the hairs on the back of my neck stand up.

Remember Salman Pak?  That was the terrorist training camp in Iraq that was used over and over again to justify the invasion.  The parallels to this new story are striking.

First of all, it feels like the story is part of a strategic communications plan.  It is not something that happened last week.  The individuals who revealed this information were captured between September and December of last year.  A key piece of information came from a Hezbollah commander who was captured in March 2007.  He is just now talking according to the article.

Nicholas Jones, 4 May 2008

While the warnings about the demise of viable journalism could hardly have been any clearer, when the vote was taken it was overwhelmingly in support of the freedom and opportunities offered by the internet. Unesco’s annual World Press Freedom Day debate at the Frontline club in London  (2.5.2008) produced a spirited exchange of views but ended with a 43-13 vote to reject a motion that “new media is killing journalism.”

David Miller 21 April 2008

The lobbyists lobby group

As a result, the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency (ALT) found a receptive audience at a busy debate in Belfast on the 3^rd of April.  Organised as a fringe meeting at the Annual Delegate Meeting of the National Union of Journalists, the event was co-sponsored by the Northern Ireland Government Affairs Group (NIGAG) is the lobbyists lobby group formed in 1999 following the Good Friday Agreement.

Nicholas Jones 18 April 2008 

Like other powerful but controversial institutions the European Parliament is stepping up its investment in what amounts to paid-for journalism. Contracts are about to be awarded for funding programmes to be broadcast by local and international television channels. But, with editorial budgets for investigative and analytical journalism in steep decline, are the European Parliament -- and also the European Commission -- faced with no alternative but to buy news coverage in the media market place in the hope of gaining some favourable exposure? If the initial reports are correct, and if the contracts likely to be awarded for programmes on CNN and ITV are to be controlled by script and even post-production approval, the European Parliament could be in danger of repeating the worst examples of embedded journalism during the Iraq War and might well end up financing nothing more than blatant propaganda. Nicholas Jones examines an initiative which is already producing some agonised soul searching among Europe’s journalists

Nicholas Jones 17 April 2008

It was modestly put but heartfelt nonetheless: bloggers believe that crap journalists are finally feeling the heat.

When a trio of celebrated bloggers were brought together by the Adam Smith Institute (16.4.2008) they were united in their belief that the collective strength of the new media was helping to start to improve the quality and accuracy of the main stream providers of news and information.

Nicholas Jones, 14 April 2008 

Celebrity reporting has had a corrosive influence on British journalistic standards. Whether the stories are sycophantic or invented the effect has been the same: a showbiz style of story-telling has been replicated in sports reporting, politics and business. In a lecture at the University of East London (3.4.2008) Nicholas Jones pulled back the veil to expose the hidden influences that have besmirched celebrity reporting and damaged the reputation of British journalism.

Nicholas Jones 7 April 2008 

Turkey's negotiations over possible membership of the European Union have triggered yet more scare stories in the British newspapers. In a speech at an EU seminar at Gaziantep in south-east Anatolia (1.4.2008), Nicholas Jones said the role played by the British press had important lessons for Turkish journalists at a time when much of their reporting was having to focus on divisive issues such as the debate over the wearing of head scarves and the lack of freedom of expression. Jones said he supported the demands by journalists in south-east Turkey for a greater awareness by the European Union of the news media's needs and more action to improve the flow of information about the potential implications of Turkey's possible accession. He gave his assessment of the hidden agendas of British media companies and the role of scare stories.

Nicholas Jones 4 April 2008 

If ever there was an example of how important it can be for politicians to understand how to exploit the news media it has to be Enoch Powell's calculated timing of his "Rivers of Blood" speech. Although Powell's apologists insist to this day that it was never his intention to deliver such a highly-inflammatory speech, the build-up had been prepared with great precision on the advice a close friend, Clem Jones, who had in effect become the MP's personal spin doctor. Jones, editor of the Wolverhampton Express and Star, had been advising Powell on how to maximise his coverage in the press and he followed to the letter the advice he was given on supplying the text in advance to a carefully-selected group of political editors, leader writers and columnists and the speech was under a strict Saturday afternoon embargo, in order to secure maximum exposure in the Sunday newspapers. Former BBC correspondent Nicholas Jones reveals a family drama which throws new light on what many political observers consider is the most controversial speech of the post-war years.