|
The future of spin: Conservatives would perpetuate New Labour control freakery |
|
|
|
|
Nicholas Jones, 1 July 2008 Hand to hand combat between the government and political correspondents would continue if the Conservatives were elected because an administration led by David Cameron would be just as determined to try to control the news agenda.
This was the conclusion of journalists and press officers at a seminar held by the Westminster Media Forum (1.7.2008). The two sides felt that the politicisation of civil service information officers, and the likelihood that any future government would find itself on the defensive, meant that further trench warfare was inevitable. |
Read The Full Article...
|
|
|
Against an avalanche of negative publicity Gordon Brown should opt for transparency |
|
|
|
|
Nicholas Jones, 22 May 2008
Gordon Brown’s formative years as a politician were spent in opposition fighting the Conservatives. Once Labour were in power and he became Chancellor, Brown was in effect in “opposition” again, promoting himself at the expense of Tony Blair. For the first time the Prime Minister has found himself continually on the defensive. In a speech at Coventry University (22.5.2008), Nicholas Jones argued that the only way Brown can deal with an avalanche of negative publicity is to face up to the news media head on and adopt a far more open and transparent communications strategy. |
Read The Full Article...
|
|
|
Will new media kill authoritative reporting? Can the internet sustain professional journalism? |
|
|
|
|
Nicholas Jones, 4 May 2008 While the warnings about the demise of viable journalism could hardly have been any clearer, when the vote was taken it was overwhelmingly in support of the freedom and opportunities offered by the internet. Unesco’s annual World Press Freedom Day debate at the Frontline club in London (2.5.2008) produced a spirited exchange of views but ended with a 43-13 vote to reject a motion that “new media is killing journalism.” Rather than pose a threat the supporters of new media believed that websites and blogs would be the saviour of journalism, continuing a revolution which began with the arrival of the printing press and which was currently producing an outpouring of opinion akin to the 18th century free for all when “anyone could write anything” in the political pamphlets of the day. |
Read The Full Article...
|
|
|
Will a decline in reporting European news result in more paid-for journalism? |
|
|
|
|
Nicholas Jones 18 April 2008 Like other powerful but controversial institutions the European Parliament is stepping up its investment in what amounts to paid-for journalism. Contracts are about to be awarded for funding programmes to be broadcast by local and international television channels. But, with editorial budgets for investigative and analytical journalism in steep decline, are the European Parliament -- and also the European Commission -- faced with no alternative but to buy news coverage in the media market place in the hope of gaining some favourable exposure? If the initial reports are correct, and if the contracts likely to be awarded for programmes on CNN and ITV are to be controlled by script and even post-production approval, the European Parliament could be in danger of repeating the worst examples of embedded journalism during the Iraq War and might well end up financing nothing more than blatant propaganda. Nicholas Jones examines an initiative which is already producing some agonised soul searching among Europe’s journalists |
Read The Full Article...
|
|
|
Is the tide turning? Are journalists who make it up finding even fewer hiding places? |
|
|
|
|
Nicholas Jones 17 April 2008 It was modestly put but heartfelt nonetheless: bloggers believe that crap journalists are finally feeling the heat. When a trio of celebrated bloggers were brought together by the Adam Smith Institute (16.4.2008) they were united in their belief that the collective strength of the new media was helping to start to improve the quality and accuracy of the main stream providers of news and information. |
Read The Full Article...
|
|
|
Max Clifford and celebrity journalism: the “holier than thou” sage on media ethics |
|
|
|
|
Nicholas Jones, 14 April 2008 Celebrity reporting has had a corrosive influence on British journalistic standards. Whether the stories are sycophantic or invented the effect has been the same: a showbiz style of story-telling has been replicated in sports reporting, politics and business. In a lecture at the University of East London (3.4.2008) Nicholas Jones pulled back the veil to expose the hidden influences that have besmirched celebrity reporting and damaged the reputation of British journalism. |
Read The Full Article...
|
|
|
Reporting the European Union: hidden agendas and the role of scare stories |
|
|
|
|
Nicholas Jones 7 April 2008 Turkey's negotiations over possible membership of the European Union have triggered yet more scare stories in the British newspapers. In a speech at an EU seminar at Gaziantep in south-east Anatolia (1.4.2008), Nicholas Jones said the role played by the British press had important lessons for Turkish journalists at a time when much of their reporting was having to focus on divisive issues such as the debate over the wearing of head scarves and the lack of freedom of expression. Jones said he supported the demands by journalists in south-east Turkey for a greater awareness by the European Union of the news media's needs and more action to improve the flow of information about the potential implications of Turkey's possible accession. He gave his assessment of the hidden agendas of British media companies and the role of scare stories. |
Read The Full Article...
|
|
|
Enoch Powell: How the "Rivers of Blood" speech was spun in advance |
|
|
|
|
Nicholas Jones 4 April 2008 If ever there was an example of how important it can be for politicians to understand how to exploit the news media it has to be Enoch Powell's calculated timing of his "Rivers of Blood" speech. Although Powell's apologists insist to this day that it was never his intention to deliver such a highly-inflammatory speech, the build-up had been prepared with great precision on the advice a close friend, Clem Jones, who had in effect become the MP's personal spin doctor. Jones, editor of the Wolverhampton Express and Star, had been advising Powell on how to maximise his coverage in the press and he followed to the letter the advice he was given on supplying the text in advance to a carefully-selected group of political editors, leader writers and columnists and the speech was under a strict Saturday afternoon embargo, in order to secure maximum exposure in the Sunday newspapers. Former BBC correspondent Nicholas Jones reveals a family drama which throws new light on what many political observers consider is the most controversial speech of the post-war years. |
Read The Full Article...
|
|
|
David Cameron: from Patten’s pup to arch media manipulator |
|
|
|
|
Nicholas Jones, 16 March 2008 David Cameron’s invitation to ITN to film his family having breakfast with their handicapped son Ivan was yet another illustration of his Blair-like charm offensive to win sympathetic media coverage.
In their new book, A Century of Spin, David Miller and William Dinan suggest Cameron’s Conservatives are nothing more than "a mirror image" of New Labour. I would go further: when it comes to the creation of his media persona, Cameron’s tactics are a virtual carbon copy of the strategies used to promote Tony Blair. The authors are to be congratulated on their detailed expose of the close and interlocking links between Cameron, his advisers, the media and the public relations and advertising industries. Cameron has already put these networks to good use: mutually constructive relations between the Conservative Party and the executives and editors of Rupert Murdoch’s newspapers have not only been revived but are closer now than they have been for years, thanks in large part to the influence of the former News of the World editor Andy Coulson who was appointed Cameron’s director of communications in May 2007. |
Read The Full Article...
|
|
|
Does the power and patronage of the British news media constitute a democratic safeguard? |
|
|
|
|
Nicholas Jones, 14 March 2008 In a lecture to students at the University of East London (13.3.2008) Nicholas Jones had to consider some difficult questions. Is Britain governed more effectively because of the power and patronage exercised by the news media? And, more to the point, does the British press, despite the trivialisation and sensationalism of much of its coverage, serve the democratic process and help deliver better government? |
Read The Full Article...
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >>
|
| Results 1 - 10 of 30 |